Covariate balancing propensity score
نویسندگان
چکیده
The propensity score plays a central role in a variety of causal inference settings. In particular, matching and weighting methods based on the estimated propensity score have become increasingly common in the analysis of observational data. Despite their popularity and theoretical appeal, the main practical difficulty of these methods is that the propensity score must be estimated. Researchers have found that slight misspecification of the propensity score model can result in substantial bias of estimated treatment effects. We introduce covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology, which models treatment assignment while optimizing the covariate balance. The CBPS exploits the dual characteristics of the propensity score as a covariate balancing score and the conditional probability of treatment assignment. The estimation of the CBPS is done within the generalized method-of-moments or empirical likelihood framework. We find that the CBPS dramatically improves the poor empirical performance of propensity score matching and weighting methods reported in the literature. We also show that the CBPS can be extended to other important settings, including the estimation of the generalized propensity score for non-binary treatments and the generalization of experimental estimates to a target population. Open source software is available for implementing the methods proposed.
منابع مشابه
Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for a Continuous Treatment: Application to the Efficacy of Political Advertisements∗
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for the propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology increases the robustness to model misspecification by directl...
متن کاملCovariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes
Propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting are popular methods for causal inference in observational studies. Under the assumption of unconfoundedness, these methods enable researchers to estimate causal effects by balancing observed covariates across different treatment values. While their extensions to general treatment regimes exist, a vast majority of applications have been...
متن کاملParametric and Nonparametric Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes∗
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology weakens this assumption by directly optimizing sample covariate b...
متن کاملImproving Covariate Balancing Propensity Score: A Doubly Robust and Efficient Approach
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating causal effects in many disciplines. However, empirical studies show that the IPTW estimators can be sensitive to the misspecification of propensity score model. To address this problem, several researchers have proposed new methods to estimate propensity score by directly optimizing the balance of pre-treatment...
متن کاملHigh Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing
In this paper, we address the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) and the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT) in observational studies when the number of potential confounders is possibly much greater than the sample size. In particular, we develop a robust method to estimate the propensity score via covariate balancing in high-dimensional settings. Since it is u...
متن کامل